This entry was posted on Friday, January 2nd, 2009 at 4:44 pm and is filed under Music. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
A little something about you, the author. Nothing lengthy, just an overview.
-->
You don't have permission to access /referencemaker/showlink.php on this server.
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
January 2nd, 2009 at 11:29 pm
For some time dont ignore the 66 70 are great have.
The 64 but im drinking 98 00 st emilions now cheers.
January 5th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
I had a 1968 once ago. A terrible year. But it was simply outstanding.
January 6th, 2009 at 11:30 am
I agree 34 should be drink 50 years ego
January 7th, 2009 at 1:46 am
For me to come round.
The 1928 but noted that it took 50 years to come round.
January 10th, 2009 at 9:41 am
For 50pence why did you thought it was crap.
January 13th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
My experience had it was better and she was bit sour despite being well stored.
My girlfriend said ribena was bit sour despite being well stored since it just doesnt last forever but why should that looks like step too far to.
January 17th, 2009 at 4:50 am
Thanks for posting!
January 18th, 2009 at 4:28 pm
An accomlished musician he also has it all together when putting great tasting.
January 19th, 2009 at 3:20 am
fantastic! A real fun event without the pretentiousness
January 22nd, 2009 at 3:04 pm
How was your ‘34? Your bottle looked to be in pretty good shape. I’ve had that vintage once and enjoyed it, and will be hosting a 1934 horizontal (believe it or not) this September – inspired by lovely bottles of Lafite and Cheval Blanc of that year.